Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

A decent Italian tank - the P40

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by Man, Aug 13, 2006.

  1. Canadian_Super_Patriot

    Canadian_Super_Patriot recruit

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,579
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    :oops: :oops: :oops: , I meant to quote this.
     
  2. Mic von Krate

    Mic von Krate New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Brunswick, Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    A decent tank like you said for 1940, but the Itailians in WW2 werent the greatest of great help to the Germans; they were more of a hindrance if you ask me. But overall, a fairly good size tank, but what also matters is the crew who can operate her.

    Mic
     
  3. Mic von Krate

    Mic von Krate New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Brunswick, Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    Here is some more info:

    P40 tank
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search

    Carro Pesante P40.The P40 was an Italian World War II tank design. Its formal name was Carro Pesante P26/40, meaning heavy tank, 26 ton, designed in 1940.

    Contents [hide]
    1 History
    2 References
    3 Characteristics
    4 External links



    [edit]
    History
    Although designed in 1940 the first prototype was not completed until 1942. The initial plan was for a 25 ton tank with a 75 mm gun and hence named P75. The development work procedeed quickly except for the engine; the Italian military staff, the Stato Maggiore, wanted a diesel engine, while the builders favoured a petrol engine. However, in Italy at the time there were no engines available, diesel or petrol, capable of delivering the necessary 300 hp required. In the end after some delays, a 420 hp petrol engine was designed. The main weapon selected was a 75/34 cannon (in lieu of the shorter barrelled original 75/18 gun). The tank's armor was sloped and 60 mm thick at the front. The P40 was the first Italian tank design that was comparable to Allied medium tanks.

    Of the 1,200 tanks ordered, only five pre-production models were completed before the Italian surrender in September 1943 when they were taken over by the German troops. About a hundred P40 tanks were built by Ansaldo from then until the end of the war although most were not entirely completed because of a lack of engines. A few were used in combat, under the German designation of Panzerkampfwagen P40 737(i), for example at Anzio. Some, without engines, were used as static strongholds.

    Armament consisted of a 75 mm main gun and an 8 mm Breda machine gun.

    [edit]
    References
    C. Falessi and B. Pafi, "Il carro armato P. 40", Storia Illustrata #150, May 1970.
    [edit]
    Characteristics
    Type: medium tank (although designated a "heavy" tank, it was actually a medium tank in World War II terms)
    Crew: 4
    Dimensions:
    Weight: 26 t
    Length: 5.75 m
    Width: 2.75 m
    Height: 2.50 m
    Performance:
    Road Speed: 40 km/h
    Range: 275 km
    Engine: 313 kW (420 hp)
    Armament:
    Main Gun: 75 mm L/34 with 75 rounds
    Coaxial Gun: 8 mm Breda 38 machine gun
    Armor: 60 mm front, 50 mm sides; of riveted steel
    Number manufactured: 220
    Users: Italy, Germany



    Italian
     
  4. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    For a 1940 tank it would have been good, the problem was it didn't show up until 1943. I think you to compare it with the tanks of it's day, not when the design started. The Pz IV was designed in the mid '30s and was still adequate at the end of the war and probably at it's peak in 1943. The most likely opponent of the P40 was the M4, which in 1943 was a much better tank than the P40. So was the T34-76 and the Churchill.
     
  5. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    Yes but the panzer IV wasd at its peak because of constant upgrades.
     
  6. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Those upgrades were design changes made to face new battlefield realities. The design of a new tank should anticipate these realities and be modified accordingly. The P40 failed in this respect because, when it appeared, it did not surpass or even match its likely enemies.

    Considering the time of its arrival, it might even be fair play to compare the P40 to the Panther...
     
  7. King Randall

    King Randall New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Romania
    via TanksinWW2
    I personally like this tank
     
  8. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    That was always the problem WW2 tank designer faced you might start with something that looked like overkill but by the time it saw the light of day it might turn out to be a bit limp wristed.
     
  9. Siberian Black

    Siberian Black New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hunting Panzer IV's
    via TanksinWW2
    Based on the specs it sound like it could have been a useful tank if it had been produced in adequet numbers. Since Italy quit the same year it went into production I think this pretty much nixed it's chance to prove itself. Considering the number of Panzer IVs, StuGs and other German-made armor, the five that did see service would have had little or no effect on the grand scale of things.

    It's like the same thing with some of the 'miracle weapons'. (Although their success is a debatable topics)
     
  10. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    You mean like a V1 rocket refitted to have a pilot in it? Germans and their crazy ideas.
     
  11. Lone Wolf

    Lone Wolf New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Merseyside, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    There was a rumour which came out of the North African campaign that said that Italian tanks had one forward gear and five reverse gears. I have studied some of the specs of Italian tanks of the period and have found no evidence that this is true.
     
  12. Hoosier phpbb3

    Hoosier phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bloomington, Indiana USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Lone Wolf:
    I think that comment is a "tongue-in-cheek" reference to their fighting mettle. (Obviously referring to the judgement that they would rather flee than fight.)
    A similar jest might state that only Italian tanks had "back-up lights."

    A popular reference--here in the states--concerns French small-arms...
    "Never fired, and only dropped once..."

    Hope this helps.

    Tim
     
  13. Lone Wolf

    Lone Wolf New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Merseyside, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Thanks.
     
  14. Lone Wolf

    Lone Wolf New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Merseyside, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Just found these great new photosa of P-40(s) one with clear German markings -

    :)
     
  15. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    Yep, only the germans used those tanks. Even those without engines, those served as an iron bunker
     
  16. Lone Wolf

    Lone Wolf New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Merseyside, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    ' course it's still very likely that, had this tank been introduced early enough to make an impact, it would still have been plagued with typical Italian problems such as poor quality armour plate and poor engine reliability. Crew training and radios may also have been issues.

    :smok:
     
  17. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    I think you're right. It's seems unlikely the Italians would have solved all their problems with this vehicle. Radio was supposed to be "RF CA 1". Anyone know if they were any good.
    Still can't get over the riveted armor, but it was a 1940 design. I think this is yet another testament to the unreadiness of Italian industry for a major war.
     

Share This Page