Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Matildas In USSR question

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by Lone Wolf, Jun 29, 2007.

  1. Lone Wolf

    Lone Wolf New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Merseyside, UK
    via TanksinWW2
  2. qwasiman

    qwasiman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    via TanksinWW2
    i´ve heard that some of the Matilda's where given He shells and even the Churchill tank which a few served in the red army but they never up gunned them because the crew men of the tanks diden´t like the turrets for some reason and i even heard they was more complicated than the Russian tanks in some ways.
     
  3. qwasiman

    qwasiman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    via TanksinWW2
    + that tehy focused on their own better tanks, T-34/76 Kv-1 and so on
     
  4. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    via TanksinWW2
    There is no record of any Matilda tanks being fitted with a different gun by the Soviets.
    Any photo's showing a Matilda with a different gun to the 2 pdr, could in fact be Matilda III CS tanks, which were fitted with a low velocity 3 inch howitzer.
    The 3 inch howitzer QF Mk I, could fire smoke and HE, but not AP.

    ps the last photo's on the bottom of the web-page you posted are actually of a Mk III CS tank ;)
     
  5. Lone Wolf

    Lone Wolf New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Merseyside, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Thanks, guys.

    Great pics though aren't they.

    :)
     
  6. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    The Russians generally liked the tanks they recieved through lend-lease; they were more user-friendly and reliable than their own production models. The Matilda II also had an advantage of armour protection even over the KV-1.
     
  7. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    but when given British tanks they often asked 'where is the main gun?'
     
  8. Stonewall phpbb3

    Stonewall phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Army of Northern Virginia
    via TanksinWW2
    http://www.iremember.ru/index.php?optio ... &Itemid=19



    Dmitriy Loza
    Memoirs - Tankers
    - Dmitriy Fedorovich, on which American tanks did you fight?

    — On Shermans. We called them «Emchas», from M4 [in Russian, em chetyrye]. Initially they had the short main gun, and later they began to arrive with the long gun and muzzle brake. On the front slope armor there was a travel lock for securing the barrel during road marches. The main gun was quite long. Overall, this was a good vehicle but, as with any tank, it had its pluses and minuses. When someone says to me that this was a bad tank, I respond, «Excuse me!» One cannot say that this was a bad tank. Bad as compared to what?

    - Dmitriy Fedorovich, did you have just American tanks in your unit?

    — Our 6th Guards Tank Army (yes, we had six of them) fought in Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Austria. We ended the war for us in Czechoslovakia. Then they rushed us to the Far East and we fought against Japan. I briefly remind you that the army consisted of two corps: 5th Guards Tank Stalingrad Corps on our own T-34s and 5th Mechanized Corps, in which I fought. For the first time this corps had British Matildas, Valentines, and Churchills.

    - They delivered the Churchill later.
     

Share This Page