Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Project Habakuk

Discussion in 'The War at Sea' started by Castelot, Jan 11, 2006.

  1. Castelot

    Castelot New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The eldest daugther of Church
    via TanksinWW2
    What do you think about that british project in WW2 to build an unsinkable giant aircraft carrier made of strengthened ice?

    Was it really realistic, and would possibly have proven effective....?
     
  2. FNG phpbb3

    FNG phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    this is joke post yes?

    like the plan to employ icebergs to sink the german navy deployed in the mid atlantic.

    FNG
     
  3. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    It depends. Surely it would have been slow and clumsy and could be only in one place at one time. Same money used to regular carriers would have given many more flattops, with maybe more aircrafts than Habakuk.

    But there was one "job" that Habakuk could have done better than dozen Essex-class carriers: Launching medium or even heavy bombers.
     
  4. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    Type Habbakak or Pykrete into Google and see for yourself.

    Also try this link

    http://www.phpbbplanet.com/forum/viewto ... ipprojects
     
  5. Man

    Man New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    [​IMG]

    What it would have looked like...
     
  6. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    okay, it's big, very slow, very unmanoeuvrable and made of ice.
    you can only deploy it in the artic area (caue it would melt in the med :cool: )
    it could come in handy to protect the northern convoys towards Russia against mass air attacks of the Germans
     
  7. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Nope - made of Pykrete.
    In a demonstration, somebody (was it Churchill?) was served a bown of hot soup in a Pykrete bowl (it did not melt).

    Very big, yes. Very slow, yes (well, I would assume so).
    But, the point is that Pykrete was very tough and did not melt.
     
  8. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    The story goes Mountbatten came to visit Churchill one day and on hearing he was in the bath said 'good thats where i want him' burst in to the bathroom and threw a lump of Pykrete into Churchills bath and it just sat there without melting with Churchill looking at it.

    Another story says that in a joint UK/US meeting someone fired a bullet at a lump of it and it bounced off going through the trouser leg of US Fleet Admiral King - there are some that may have wished it went a few inches closer given the animosity at the time (and still existing today) over Admiral king's policies regarding convoy.

    6-8 kts seems to be the most often quoted spped.

    There is a story using an actual Habbakuk here - they are hightailing it out of the Persian Gulf due to a mysterious bug that is feeding on the pykrete.


    http://p216.ezboard.com/fwarships1discussionboardsfrm6

    Look for CV Habbakuk
     
  9. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    not melting?? i find tht hard to believe. it is ice combined with woodpulp. ice melts. i can assume that it will melt very very slowly but not melting at all?
     
  10. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    A small prototype was built. Apparently it lasted for months even after the cooling system was turned off in a +0 degrees climate.
     
  11. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
  12. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    It would have been a useful piece of kit to have started the war with. However in wartime it was overtaken by developements. Still you have to wonder whether the idea would be useful for building mega freighters?
     
  13. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    The freighter idea does ring a bell, cant think where I saw it right now.
     
  14. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I think it all sounds like something out of a B movie... :) ;)
     

Share This Page