Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Tangmere attack 26/8/40

Discussion in 'Air War in Western Europe 1939 - 1945' started by GRW, Aug 4, 2010.

  1. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,048
    Likes Received:
    3,231
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
  2. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,323
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks Gordon. The more I read about things like this in the BoB, the more I admire the English pilots. I am always amazed at their reckless courage. I'm still not sure whether the English win was more attributable to the bravery of the English pilots, or some lack of fortitude on the part of the Luftwaffe. Yes, the English suffered terrible losses, but it seems that no matter how outmanned or outgunned the RAF was, it was the Luftwaffe that turned back or scattered.

    Great article.
     
  3. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    This seems a good excuse to post this pic of a relic in my collection ; it's a crankshaft bearing from the engine of a Ju87, the wreckage of which was raised from the sea just off the Sussex coast some years ago. Although no identification plates were found, the aircraft is believed to be one of those shot down while attacking Tangmere....

    [​IMG]
     
  4. merlin

    merlin Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think you''ll find there were also Scottish & Welsh pilots in the RAF, rather than 'English'!
    The problem for the LW was that needed a 4/1 kill/loss rate, to establish supremacy, and still have fighters to give cover for the invasion beaches.
    Whereas the times when they achieved overall success, was with low intensity, when high no's of aircraft were involved the RAF higher kill/loss rate.
     
  5. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    They won because of their preparedness in the short time before ww2. The ground communi9cations and setup, radar of chain high sites, the ROC setup, the sector ops and Gp ops interoprability, the comms links urgently initiated and the teleprinter network installed hurridly, and the post office who worked like buggers to tie up all damaged lines and I mean thousands of copper strands that gangs of post office engineers attended to without any real acclaim for their part. The fighter boys did their bit. But if the infrastructure of 1940 RAF communications had not been in place together with the combat plans of the groups and command structure then they would have bee flying blind and missing most of their targets.
     
  6. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    Not to mention Poles, Canadians, etc ... even a "Yank" or two.
     

Share This Page