Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Battleships or heavy cruisers?..you make the call

Discussion in 'Naval Warfare in the Pacific' started by Class of '42, Mar 20, 2020.

  1. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,104
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    The did see the Amagiri, but the problem was that the were just idling along - so as to leave no wake - the phosphorescent wake would have given them away well before. Also, the PTs that had radar had already separated. Low speed & low via ability did them in, but there really were not other options.
     
  2. the_diego

    the_diego Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    404
    Likes Received:
    86
    I think that, for as long as depth allowed it, battleships were suited in fighting around a variable shoreline (like Norwegian fjords,) or numerous islands (like Guadalcanal and Central Philippines.) The difficulty of spotting and tracking them, possibly showing up with little warning, makes a battleship fearsome indeed. Compare those settings with, say, the Bismark and Graf Spee in open sea, or Yamamoto's main force at Midway. The Bismark and Graf Spee were not likely to survive long, while Yamamoto's battleships weren't even a factor at Midway.

    A cruiser's speed and range, on the other hand, would serve it well during a mid-ocean campaign.
     

Share This Page