Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Cool pix!

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by A-58, May 30, 2017.

  1. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,250
    Likes Received:
    3,470
    upload_2023-2-18_0-15-36.jpeg

    A rare comparison between the 35 and the 22…
     
    Biak and Half Track like this.
  2. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,968
    "I told Orville, I told Wilbur, and now I'm tellin' YOU, that thing will never get off the ground."
     
  3. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    2,667
    230202-F-XX000-9002.jpeg Flying with friends
    U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancers and F-22 Raptors fly alongside Republic of Korea Air Force F-35 Lightning IIs during a bilateral mission in the vicinity of the Yellow Sea, Feb. 1, 2023. The training between allies and partners demonstrated support for a free and open Indo-Pacific. (Courtesy photo)
     
    OpanaPointer and CAC like this.
  4. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,250
    Likes Received:
    3,470
    I didn’t think F22s could leave US airspace?
     
  5. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    2,667
    They go wherever the hell they want to.

    Trust me.
     
    OpanaPointer likes this.
  6. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    2,667
    Adding a bit more information:

    CAMP HUMPHREYS, South Korea — The U.S. and South Korean air forces carried out their first air drill of the year, a day after defense chiefs from both countries agreed to increase joint training due to continued threats from North Korea.

    South Korean F-35A Lightning II stealth fighters drilled Wednesday with U.S. F-35Bs, F-22 Raptors and B-1B Lancer bombers over the Yellow Sea, according to a Ministry of National Defense news release Thursday.

    “The combined air drills held at this time show the U.S.’s will and ability to provide strong and reliable extended deterrence in preparation for North Korea’s nuclear and missile threat,” the release said.


    The exercise was held one day after U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Defense Minister Lee Jong-sup met in Seoul. Austin, during a news briefing Wednesday, described his talks with Lee as “highly productive” and said the two agreed to continue military drills amid “North Korea’s unprecedented number of provocations.”

    American bombers last flew with the South Korean fighters on Dec. 20, two days after North Korea fired a ballistic missile toward the East Sea, or Sea of Japan. U.S. B-52 Stratofortess bombers and F-22s flew with South Korean F-35s and F-15K Slam Eagles around South Korea’s airspace to bolster “capabilities to respond to North Korea’s nuclear and missile threats,” the defense ministry said in a news release at the time.

    U.S. B-1B bombers also took part in a drill over South Korean airspace on Nov. 19, one day after North Korea fired a ballistic missile that dropped into Japan’s exclusive economic zone.

    U.S. and South Korean officials said last year that North Korea had prepared to conduct its seventh nuclear test, its first since 2017. The communist regime fired about 75 missiles the same year, an annual record.

    Large-scale military exercises that had been suspended or downscaled were restarted by Washington and Seoul last year in light of Pyongyang’s unprecedented activity.

    The aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan sailed to Busan in September, its first such port call in five years.

    One month later, roughly 240 U.S. and South Korean aircraft flew 1,600 sorties, the largest number ever, as part of the Vigilant Storm exercise in October."

    I've omitted the rest of the article since it was mearly North Korean BS.
     
    Half Track likes this.
  7. Half Track

    Half Track Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,684
    Likes Received:
    957
    Location:
    Chambersburg Pennsylvania
    C4A54937-35BC-40F4-B2F3-6AE19F7DFDD6.jpeg
     
    Biak and CAC like this.
  8. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,250
    Likes Received:
    3,470
    Parasol aircraft in the background...umm...or a bird.
     
  9. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,968
    I once downloaded the entire photographic section of NHHC. I quickly realized I wasn't 24 insane people, so I just left them alone. Indexing will have to wait for a better AI.
     
  10. Carronade

    Carronade Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,353
    Likes Received:
    877
    Maybe L-4s or similar Army aircraft? I expect the invasion force included a few of them, although I have not seen them listed as transported by any of the carriers. The photo is just dated Nov 1942, so it could be a few days after the initial landings.
     
    mcoffee and CAC like this.
  11. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    2,667
    020475.jpg

    Almost the same angle !

    Found this picture here:
    Aircraft Carrier Photo Index: USS RANGER (CV-4)

    An Army L-4 Cub prepares to launch from Ranger on 9 November, shortly before 2PM. Ranger carried three L-4s to the operation and launched them to serve as artillery spotters with ground forces.
     
  12. mcoffee

    mcoffee Son-of-a-Gun(ner)

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    436
    Downloaded the hi-res version and zooming shows them to definitely be L-4's.
     
    Biak likes this.
  13. Carronade

    Carronade Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,353
    Likes Received:
    877
    The gun forward of the island is interesting. Ranger as built carried 5"/38s 5"/25s and .50 caliber machine guns, typical for the mid-1930s. As WWII got underway, AA batteries were supplemented with quad 1.1" automatic cannons. Ranger was scheduled to get six of them, including mounts forward and aft of the island. Many ships had the gun tubs installed before sufficient 1.1s were produced and carried 3"/50 caliber AA guns as a temporary installation, which apparently is what we see in the photo. I thought Ranger had received her 1.1s in 1941, even wrote it in a post once, but it looks like not.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2023
    Biak likes this.
  14. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,968
    I thought everybody knew that.

    Except me, of course.
     
    Biak likes this.
  15. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    2,667
    I didn't/don't have a clue But, I do like to look.
     
  16. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    2,667
    230222153202-01-chinese-surveillance-balloon-air-force-pilot-super-169.jpg Here's something you don't see everyday.
     
  17. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,250
    Likes Received:
    3,470
    Why didnt they shoot it down with the gun? Would've left the payload more intact...
     
  18. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    2,667
    U2's ain't armed. :D
    It was most likely better to fire one missile than punch little holes all over it. Looking at the videos I'm guessing they wanted to separate the payload.
     
  19. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,250
    Likes Received:
    3,470
    I think they wanted the vision...Domestically and for China...Just a guess.
     
  20. Carronade

    Carronade Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,353
    Likes Received:
    877
    I had the same thought, that if you could shoot the right number of holes in it, the balloon and payload might come down slowly and more or less intact. However, I read somewhere in all the news chatter that there was an earlier incident involving an errant (weather?) balloon somewhere over the North Atlantic and a fighter trying to shoot it down, firing several hundred rounds, which failed to down it; it was last seen drifting towards the Arctic.
     
    Biak likes this.

Share This Page