Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Governments

Discussion in 'Non-World War 2 History' started by Roel, Apr 8, 2005.

  1. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Selfishness in Adam Smith style, though. They met a demand for workforce. ;)

    By the way there's German "Gastarbeiter" and Dutch "gastarbeiders" but no "gastearbeidern" that I'm aware of, or is that Danish?
     
  2. Izaak Stern

    Izaak Stern New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    I had a vague idea that it might look like Dutch.... The correct Danish would be : gaestearbejderne.

    Yes, pure Adam Smith, without a slightest thought of future social consequencies.

    In fact, these people are often unhappy. They would by far prefer to live in own countries; they resent the more or less hidden racism, they hate seeing their children mobbed, or opposite - getting "like the Danes/Germans etc..." .
    They have no way back, though. They´ve lost the necessary tricks of survival in their own lands.
    They want to show those back home that they are successful, even if they only get social help and get gradually more frustrated and passive.

    I really don´t know who really suffers more from the Smithian experiment....

    Is there anybody here who can give some optimistic way out of this problem?
     
  3. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    The only real solution is integration into the community of wherever they live.

    It is interesting though. In the 1950s Britain had a wave of black immigrants, mostly from the Caribbean/Bahamas. Yes, there has been the occaisional upsurge of rasicm (I never really got how people can be that thick :-? ) , but by & large these immigrants (who did usually end up in the lower-paid & menial jobs) slotted into British society fairly well. Most still speak of Jamaica / Trinidad / wherever as 'home', but they are, essentially, British. Interestingly, those who do go home sometimes find they are spurned as 'British'...

    So why, if it worked for them, does it not work so well for Pakistanis / Bangladeshis / etc?
    Is it because they tend to ghettoise? (In Luton we have Bury Park)
    Or are we still in the initial 'settling in' phase?
     
  4. Izaak Stern

    Izaak Stern New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    For one thing - the Carrabean Gents were English (sort of) speaking form day 1. Plus some colonial memories...
    The other thing is, that the present wave is very voluminous, giving almost instant (and natural) ghettoization. To this, add the universal distrust the Muslims have of all things western or Jewish-inspired.

    Besides - the Carabbean wave came here to work. the peoples´of the present wave know the conditions (mass unemployment) and count on social serices from the start, at least many of them.
     
  5. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Same for Pakistani / Bangladeshi...

    But I agree (by & large) with your other points.
     
  6. Izaak Stern

    Izaak Stern New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Yes, right.... but you have Islam here, while the Caribbeans were Christian, right?
     
  7. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    That is an important difference.
     

Share This Page