Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

MiG-19 versus F-100 Super Sabre?

Discussion in 'Air Warfare' started by Varyag, Dec 9, 2006.

  1. Tony Williams

    Tony Williams Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    For home defence purposes, the WW2 Luftwaffe fitted self-destruct fuzes to their aircraft cannon ammo - they would blow up after about 1,000m or so. The same would have been routine for all AA cannon - you don't want to shell yourself, after all. Nothing you can do about .50 cal bullets, though - they came down in one piece. Fortunately for the Americans, it was never their country that their bullets landed in...

    Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion forum
     
  2. Grieg

    Grieg New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,625
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2

    A little dig there in that last comment perhaps? It's unwise to use the term never. Of course 50 caliber bullets did indeed fall on Hawaii.
    It was also foreign soil where most of the US WW II dead were buried.
     
  3. sinissa

    sinissa New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    All AA misiles and shells explode after some thime (not just AA,modern RPG allso) so basicly not much drop on the ground,and there is anotther reason,air blast can DMG planes allso.Most of modern ground to air misiles dont aim in plain,they calculate best position to explode in air,coz it is higher chance that will shoot down the craft.
     
  4. Siberian Black

    Siberian Black New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hunting Panzer IV's
    via TanksinWW2
    True. The aircraft is one thing, but you put me and a trained fighter in a simulation and I'd have a hard time getting off the ground (strafing practise for them.....) much less flying the thing and shooting them down- even if I knew what half displays meant. Fighters are a little more complicated than a Cessna 172.
     
  5. Blaster

    Blaster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    The Mig-19 still shows it's complete superiority in every area over it's useless, hunk-of-junk, waste-of-money compeititor. The jet that obviously wins is the Mig.
     
  6. Tony Williams

    Tony Williams Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    No more than a mild joke - I sit corrected, although I suspect that most of the .50 bullets which fell on Hawaii came from the Navy's AA guns.

    Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion forum
     
  7. Blaster

    Blaster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    So, does everyone agree that the Mig 19 is far superior to the hunk of junk American contender?
     
  8. sinissa

    sinissa New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Whell it is pretty obviosly.Only thing where f-100 can match MIG-19 was low altitude dogfight,and faster diving (weight),and slight betther aiming system,but MIG wins all otther aspect.
     
  9. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    .

    before going big on today , what was the score mig-21 versus phantom

    there were, I believe, a few meetings in the middle east
    around the sixties seventies .


    .
     
  10. smeghead phpbb3

    smeghead phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melbourne, Orst-Ray-Lia
    via TanksinWW2
  11. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    .

    Yummy , smeghead , I'll pick the meat of this bird over the holidays

    thanks a bunch :D :D :D and merry xmass all !



    .
     
  12. JCalhoun

    JCalhoun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mobile, Alabama- Heart of Dixie
    via TanksinWW2
    Very interesting. Thanks for the link.

    From what I could tell a F-100 shot down a MiG-17 but I didn't see where any F-100's were lost to MiG's. Maybe I over looked it?

    I think something on there could be a typo. They list a F-102 being lost but I'm not aware that any were sent to SEA. Could it have been a F-100, RF-101, or F-105?
     
  13. Hubsu

    Hubsu New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    64th FIS/405th FW
    82nd FIS/51st FW
    509th FIS/405th FW

    All flew F-102As and TF-102As from bases in Vietnam and Thailand.

    Edit: Deuce in SEA camo
    http://www.svsarah.com/Non-Sailing/Naha ... rotate.JPG
     
  14. JCalhoun

    JCalhoun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mobile, Alabama- Heart of Dixie
    via TanksinWW2
    Very good! I had no idea. :D
     
  15. Hubsu

    Hubsu New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    For some reason, I just wanted to keep searching for more information about Deuces in SEA.

    "A total of 15 F-102 fighters were lost in Vietnam. Three were shot down by anti-aircraft or small arms fire, one was lost in air-to-air combat with a MiG-21, four were destroyed on the ground during Viet Cong mortar attacks, and the remainder succumbed to accidents."

    The lost F-102 was from 509th FIS. Two 102s were flying a MIGCAP mission over Laos when they were jumped by a group of MiG-21s and the Deuce was shot down with no losses to the MiGs.
     
  16. Blaster

    Blaster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    I wish an entire wing of F22s were there at the time, to give those Migs a Sidewinder or 10.
     
  17. JCalhoun

    JCalhoun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mobile, Alabama- Heart of Dixie
    via TanksinWW2
    The Phantoms had Sidewinders.

    Air to Air missiles back then had one bad problem. They could get confused and seak the plane that launched them. This usually happened when lot of manuevering was happening and the missiles track to the best signal.
     
  18. Blaster

    Blaster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    That's gonna' leave a mark on an Air Force ace's permament record. Getting shot by his own missile.
     
  19. JCalhoun

    JCalhoun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mobile, Alabama- Heart of Dixie
    via TanksinWW2
    It happened a couple times and the Soviet made missiles had the same flaw but not much is recorded about them.
     
  20. Blaster

    Blaster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    So, just to clarify, the obvious landslide winner is the Mig 19, right?
     

Share This Page