Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Modern versatile AFV

Discussion in 'Post-World War 2 Armour' started by liang, Oct 3, 2004.

  1. Jeffrey phpbb3

    Jeffrey phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    476
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Hmmm, maybe you got a point there, BUT:

    AFV= Armoured Fighting Vehicle
    IFV= Infantry Fighting vehicle

    Than you got:

    APC= Armored personel Carrier
    AIFV= Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle

    And imo the M113 isn't really a FIGHTING vehicle, its more like a battle-taxi APC.

    I think in terms of mobility, firepower, protection and functionality it is of a lower level than the IFV's, you can't compare them with eachother.
    (especially because of its armor, we currently have the YPR-765, this is like an upgraded M113 with add-on frontal, side and top armor and the infantry-compartment is completely changed + it got a 25mm cannon, and still it can't compete with an IFV like the Bradley or BMP-3, you can shoot trought the add-on armor with a .50, so its nothing...)
     
  2. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Surely TOW-FIST, M163, ADATS, M113 FSV (Australia) qualify it as a fighting vehicle?
    All depends on threat level.
    Oli
     
  3. lynn1212

    lynn1212 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    upstate NY USA
    via TanksinWW2
    cav tracks in nam

    the cav in nam used M-113s armed with 1 .50 M2 and 2 M-60s. all with shields and got into one heck of a lot of fights. don't try to tell a cav trooper his M113 wasn't a fighting track. besides MTB MIFV APC or any other name you care to call then they all are AFVs. if they get shot at and shoot back and have armor they quilify even perhaps a heavy hummer.
     

Share This Page